by Nigel Swift, Heritage Action
Not content with flouting archaeological guidelines at their Foxham rally the members of Colchester metal detecting club are holding one at Boxted which seems equally unheroic. It’s strictly members only and there’s no mention of it being in aid of charity this time – in fact it seems more of a help yourself, surprise buffet type of event with only the members benefitting.
“Finds over 300 years old and over £300 in value and items subject to treasure trove to be divided 50/50 with the land owner.”
That’s nice. So we can deduce that if a find is worth £300 or more then the finder gets £150 or more (up to utter oodles, one assumes) and if it’s worth £299 (and who makes the assessment?!? Guess! Go on!) then the finder gets £299 and the farmer gets nowt. Such love of history! Such lack of interest in money!

That's £299 for me and nothing for the landowner. And there's another £299 for me and nothing for the landowner. Oooh and there's another £299 for me and .......
Ironically, a National Council for Metal Detecting representative recently characterised the CBA Portable Antiquities conference as….“all a part of a sustained attack on the hobby which the CBA and their seedy band of followers view as an easy target.” But when it comes to making themselves easy targets and acting in an utterly seedy way the Colchester Metal Detecting club seems to take the heritage biscuit.
Are they typical? Well that’s a ticklish question in search of a British heritage professional or resource protection agency with the pluck to ask it! Ten million seven hundred thousand artefacts dug up since 1975 and the landowners who own them not getting a penny for any of them that are worth less than £299? Can that possibly be right? Or even partly right? Even at an average value of only £20 per artefact that suggests farmers have had more than two hundred million pounds worth of goods removed from their fields and not been paid for them (except for a very grateful “bottle of whisky at Christmas”)!
Is this the process British archaeology is in partnership with because it’s mostly “responsible”? I think I must have missed the train to Liaisonville so remove my critical faculties and beam me up Roger!
_____________________________________________
Heritage Action vindicated at Portable Antiquities conference
Largest detecting forum confesses to undermining PAS
PAS to support metal detecting sales push
Metal detecting and helping Donald Trump: two additions to the British education syllabus?
Wiltshire metal detecting rally flouts archaeological guidelines
Metal detecting at the end of the noughties: bad just got worse.
Metal detecting: a letter to English Heritage
The Staffordshire Hoard and Metal Detecting? My Irish Eyes see an Illegal Activity
Metal detecting: half a million artefacts removed since Britain pulled out of Basra
Metal Detecting: more evidence it’s all for the love of history?
Metal Detecting: now the dealers are heroes too!
Metal Detecting: support from abroad – but look who it’s from!



4 comments
Comments feed for this article
17/04/2010 at 03:05
Bob Norton
I must congratulate all of you for your nobal Heritage Journal site which had my full support untill I read the ill-informed juvenile spiteful villification of the responsible organisation of Colchester Metel Detecting Club.
18/04/2010 at 12:54
heritageaction
We’re awfully sorry but we don’t think being outraged that utterly selfish people from Essex are helping themselves to history from 100 year old undisturbed Wiltshire pasture in flagrant disregard to what’s right is ill-informed juvenile spiteful villification of the responsible organisation of Colchester Metel Detecting Club.
27/03/2011 at 20:57
r watcham
i wonder when your drivel on detecting will ever be accurate. land owners are the actual owners of all items found. under the pas any items which fall within the parameters of the act and is disclaimed is in theory the property of the land owner who can claim them. any item declared treasure is valued by the state and bought by the state. whatever the price paid it is split equally between the finder and the land owner.i would pose the question would you prefer the heritage of our country to be destroyed in the ground by the fertilisers etc sprayed or to be recorded
28/03/2011 at 07:09
Nigel
Perhaps you would care to point out precisely which part of the article is inaccurate?