You are currently browsing the daily archive for 13/10/2013.

As the parents of scouts we suspect you are more responsible, thoughtful and socially aware than average. Consequently we should like you to do a little research regarding the scout group metal detecting rally at Laverstoke Park, Hampshire that your youngsters may have recently attended.

You have a choice in the event of further invitations. Either you can believe a metal detecting club and a global detecting manufacturer (who financed the event and handed out prizes and goody bags) that artefact hunting  is a fine thing to get young people interested in or you can heed what The Council for British Archaeology says :

“As long as it remains safe then it is better to leave the evidence for future generations to investigate with better techniques and with better-informed questions to ask. Usually, intervention is only justified if the evidence is at risk of being lost or damaged, through development, climate change, or agricultural practices. In this case, any excavation work has to be carried out carefully to ensure that we extract as many clues as possible not just about any objects that are found, but about the full circumstances of the way in which they were initially buried and any materials or evidence buried in association with them”.

Update: Here’s an account of scouts using metal detectors as part of a proper archaeological exercise designed to harvest knowledge for society not personal gain, which “helped them achieve their heritage badge”. (All parents should note the difference.)



More Heritage Action views on metal detecting and artefact collecting


Viewed edge-on a typical artefact such as an ancient coin is about a sixteenth of an inch wide. On that basis the Counter says if you lined up edgeways all the artefacts dug up and mostly not reported since 1975 they’d stretch 11.75 miles!



That’s “wrong” say all ten thousand artefact hunters and no archaeologists. But so far no-one has offered a reply to the fundamental question posed in the Papers of the Institute of Archaeology (Vol 20) by Prof David Gill:

How far out would this estimate [the Heritage Action Erosion Counter] need to be before it became a matter of marginal concern?

Opinions anyone? What if it was only ten miles? Would that be a concern to Britain? Or eight? Or six? Or four?


More Heritage Action views on metal detecting and artefact collecting



October 2013

Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on Facebook

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 10,809 other subscribers
%d bloggers like this: