You’d think Stonehenge had troubles enough, what with proper protection being ditched in favour of proper vote catching and the National Trust inexplicably going along with it. So what it doesn’t need is loads of American detectorists piling in to support the short tunnel. (Nor, truth to tell, does the Trust, bearing in mind the ramshackle case they are trying to maintain and the fact they don’t allow metal detectorists onto any of their land!) Yet supporting the short tunnel is exactly what a British detectorist is urging American colleagues to do:
“May I through the comments section ask that support be given to the UK’s National Trust who favour the ‘short tunnel’ option to protect Stonehenge from traffic. We need to counter the propaganda nonsense spouted by Heritage Harry, aka, Nigel Swift of Heritage Action who is desperate to see the ‘short tunnel’ option binned. Write to:- enquiries@nationaltrust.org.uk . I already have. Please support the ‘short tunnel’ option.”
The new Stonehenge World Heritage landscape. “Awesome”
If, on the other hand, you aren’t an American detectorist and you oppose new damage at Stonehenge, please sign the petition. Plus, if you’re an NT Member please write to them saying: “I see you are submitting the short tunnel to a Members’ vote. I vote NO.”
The Heritage Journal 
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
22/03/2015 at 10:27
Edwin Deady
Contacted the NT as a member and said I oppose any tunnel which should be the position of anybody concerned with heritage.
22/03/2015 at 15:14
thegrammarofmatter
On a visit to Danebury Ring a few years ago we spotted a couple of detectorists lurking in the trees at the bottom of the great ditch. They got a bit shirty when challenged. I’m sure the NT will be grateful for their support.