Why yowling moggy? Because a series of misrepresentations (6 so far) may suggest a concerted agenda….

.

It didn’t take long did it?!

The Times has said (presumably having been briefed) that “In May the tunnel won the backing of Unesco“.

No. The advisory mission for UNESCO expressed misgivings that a short tunnel of 2.9km would be technically possible without irreversible damage to the World Heritage Site’s Outstanding Universal Value: we are concerned that associated portals and dual carriageways could have a highly adverse impact on other parts of the World Heritage landscape that cannot be set aside, however great the benefits of a tunnel.

By what possible interpretation is that “backing the tunnel”?

.

Watch out for the seventh!

[To see the others put Yowling in the search box.]