Alice Farnsworth is back, to answer another reader’s archaeological query. Don’t forget to send in your questions, and you may be lucky enough to get your own answer from Alice!
Q. As the old adage goes: ‘Take only photographs, leave only footprints‘, but don’t footprints cause erosion to delicate sites? How can I minimise my interactions with our ancient sites, given that I feel visiting a site in person is the only way for me to truly experience it?
A. Ha! Yes, it’s true that footfall is a major cause of erosion at our ancient sites, especially at the more popular sites. For instance, the banks at Avebury have often been fenced off to allow the soil to recover from visitors.
There is no simple answer to this question. one way to minimise impact would be to only view sites from a distance (as enforced at Stonehenge), but I can see that this is unsatisfactory in many ways. Limiting your visits to sites that are much less popular with tourists would allow you to gain the interaction you seek. But remember that many of the lesser known sites are on private land where permission may be needed to visit them, or may be off the beaten track with the safety issues that that implies.
Ensuring that you only visit in periods of suitable weather will also reduce the impact of your visit, as fragile sub-surface archaeology can be unwittingly damaged when the ground is sodden. But beware if the weather has been too dry, as the ground underfoot may then crumble and erode, and again, archaeological evidence could be destroyed.
Of course, when visiting any ancient or historical site, you should always attempt to remove any rubbish left behind by others less considerate than yourself, and of course, ensure you do not leave any detritus of your own.
In short, enjoy your visit, and leave the site as you would hope to find it – in its natural state.
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
31/05/2018 at 07:43
davidmcglade
Alice is correct in explaining the increased risk of erosion to archaeological earthworks when soils are saturated. It is a big topic and one that is rarely even acknowledged. In 2017 I left the post of Hadrian’s Wall Path National Trail Officer and during my 20 odd years there we grappled, successfully at times, with the issue. Our number one ‘conservation tip’ was to encourage Trail walkers to walk side-by-side instead of in single file and to avoid walking in wear lines. The message is counter intuitive but it effectively doubles the carrying capacity of the grass sward, costs nothing, and on Hadrian’s Wall Path sufficient numbers of walkers followed the code for it to make a difference. I have a graphic notice to illustrate this but I don’t think it is possible to post it here. I could write a piece for the Journal.
Dave McGlade
Chairman Offa’s Dyke Association
http://www.offasdyke.org.uk
@nationaltrailuk
31/05/2018 at 09:59
Alan S.
Dave, we’d certainly be more than happy to publish a more in depth article on the subject, with your assistance. Please see our Contact Us page for address details.