Trail Hunting on National Trust land is banned!
.
Links
- ARCH
- Artefact Erosion Counter
- Avebury
- CASPN
- Cornwall Archaeology Society
- Council for British Archaeology
- English Heritage
- Ethical Metal Detecting Association
- Heritage Snippets
- ICOMOS-UK
- Journey to the Past
- Megalithomania
- Orkneyjar
- PAS FUNDRAISING APPEAL
- Portable Antiquity Collecting and Heritage Issues
- Rescue
- Tackling Heritage Crime
- The Art of Jane Tomlinson
- The Modern Antiquarian
- The National Trust
- The Stone Rows of Great Britain
- Wiltshire Heritage Museum
Recent Posts
Archives
Pages
Follow Us
Join 10,420 other followers
Twitter Feed
- A metal detectorist confesses heritageaction.wordpress.com/2022/08/13/a-m… 2 days ago
- At last, something cheerful! heritageaction.wordpress.com/2022/08/11/at-… 4 days ago
- Crippets Long Barrow: the original Capital of the Cotswolds? (Revisited) heritageaction.wordpress.com/2022/08/09/cri… 6 days ago
- Local Authority metal detecting policy in damaging shambles? heritageaction.wordpress.com/2022/08/07/loc… 1 week ago
- Revealing the Prehistoric Communities of the White Horse. heritageaction.wordpress.com/2022/08/06/rev… 1 week ago
The Heritage Journal 
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
26/11/2021 at 09:30
paulintheswimhotmailcom
It has to be said that it has taken many years of hard work by many good people to finally get National Trust to begrudgingly admit they were wrong by pretending to believe the smokescreen of lies that trail hunting actually is.
At some time in the future, hopefully National Trust will also bow to public opinion (and most of the archaeologists who aren’t afraid of English Heritage) and admit that the Stonehenge tunnel is NOT a good thing for the WIDER Stonehenge landscape.
A good example of just ONE of the smokescreen of lies that relates to the tunnel…is English Heritage’s glib and untrue claim that “ Blick Mead will not be damaged ”.
04/12/2021 at 08:31
heritageaction
Indeed.
All that is said about where is that it was in a paddock. Might it be reasonable to think people with a paddock might be better-heeled in pocket and brain than some, and might well have been open to proper advice from officialdom, if offered?