You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ category.


Hopefully, this was the colour of the faces of those in English Heritage, Historic England and The National Trust who are lobbying to defy UNESCO by causing a mile of massive new damage to the World Heritage Landscape surrounding Stonehenge, upon hearing that last night Stonehenge was nominated Britain’s Greatest Treasure.

English Heritage says the best way to do it is like this:

“We want to get more young people engaged in archaeology and history at our amazing sites across the country. This is why we have started the Saturday Archaeology Club at Wrest Park….”




But consider this: weren’t a large number of the present generation of archaeologists inspired not by digging in a pretend pit but by their first sight of the iconic view of Stonehenge as they went on their summer holidays – you know, the view English Heritage are lobbying to hide from all potential young archaeologists forever!

What unworthy motivation impels present archaeologists to deprive future archaeologists of the transformative childhood thrill which they themselves enjoyed?

Bodies acting as heritage guardians hate accusations that they act in an inconsistent way as it’s the one thing they can’t wriggle out of. So here goes:

1. English Heritage have put Turner’s house on the At Risk Register “because houses like this should go on forever” while lobbying for the Turner vista of Stonehenge to be hidden from tens of millions of travellers forever!

2. The National Trust are calling for the same thing without dropping their “For ever, for Everyone” motto!

3. And no, Historic England, can’t escape the charge. Back in November we pointed out they were supporting the tunnel which would remove the sightlines to Stonehenge while at the same time opposing the Tulip tower in London on the grounds it would interrupt sightlines to the Tower of London.

You might reasonably expect all three would try to explain the inconsistencies to the public, but no, government lapdogs rarely defend lapdoggery. But in the case of Historic England, at least, they’ve been let off the hook – the Mayor of London has said no to the Tulip so they’ll never have to explain their inconsistent position to anyone! Lucky them!



Here is Constable’s painting of Old Sarum in 1829.

Who can deny the surrounding landscape is a vital part of the whole?



No-one. Yet at Oswestry an equivalent landscape is in peril, purely for money.

Following our recent complaint that the Staffordshire Hoard is still being looted, someone has pointed out “there’s security there so don’t distort the truth”. Well, we know about the “security” and photographed this single notice 6 years ago:


It post dated our revelation that nighthawking was going on and simply said: “this site is being monitored” – which, we’re willing to bet, meant an occasional drive by by a security officer. Not a lot of use on a dark night in a field high above the road and hence invisible from it and when manufacturers have given oiks the ability to mute the sound and light from their detectors. And of course, it disappeared very soon and hasn’t re-appeared.

Perhaps we need to point out that this is the site of the world’s greatest Anglo Saxon assemblage.


More Heritage Journal views on artefact collecting

When you go against your reason for existence to please politicians it’s only a matter of time before it decides to come back to bite you.

And now it has happened. At the same time English Heritage are lobbying so hard for the “Turner View” of Stonehenge to be hidden from millions of travellers forever, another arm of their organisation has announced they’ve put Turner’s house on the At Risk Register “because houses like this should go on forever”! Ouch! What could be worse?

Well, it could get worse for if, as may happen, the Stonehenge tunnel is cancelled, what will English Heritage’s press release look like next morning? “Hurrah, we never really wanted it to happen” or “What a shame, we bitterly regret there’ll be no new damage to the World Heritage Landscape”?!

Archaeologists undertaking dedicated research projects within the World Heritage Site quite rightly sieve 100% of the entire ploughsoil. By contrast, Highways England has just told dismayed archaeologists that only a small amount of the topsoil removed during landscaping would be sieved for objects of scientific and historical interest as 100% sieving would take too long and prove too expensive! Instead, they will sample between 4 and 14%!

Professor Mike Parker Pearson has estimated that as a result half a million prehistoric artefacts could go unexamined and be lost to science. In response (see the Daily Telegraph (10/07/2019), Jim Hunter of Highways England said: “We are confident we can deal with the archaeology in an appropriate way …”

What possible confidence can the public have in that assurance?

We’ll be holding our 17th annual gathering for stoney people in the SE quadrant of Avebury Henge (go through the entrance opposite The Red Lion) from midday onwards on Sunday 21st July (or in the Lion if wet). Please bring a chair or a rug, a picnic, books to swap and tall tales of tall stones.

We’ll be close to the old chapel where “Stonekiller” Tom Robinson often worshipped. Public Historian Brian Edwards tells us that Stukeley called Tom “a mallet” for knocking up his wife with their fifth child when she was around 50, forcing him to increase his stone-breaking activities to get enough money to support them all.

Tom has been invited but may not turn up ….


Notification to the Competition and Markets Authority

We wish to report to the Authority a case of anti-competitive behaviour.

Our Name: The Heritage Journal

Business we are raising issues about? The English Heritage Trust

Which market do you think the issue is in? Heritage Tourism

Nature of issue:
An attempt is being made by English Heritage to create a near monopoly in their own favour by supporting the hiding of the free view of Stonehenge from tens of millions of people, thereby leaving anyone who wishes to see the stones at all little option other than to go to the English Heritage site and pay £19.


[ Anyone who would like to make their own representations to the Competition and Markets Authority may do so here ]


July 2019
« Jun    

Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on Facebook

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 10,133 other followers

%d bloggers like this: