.
They might have added: that obligation simply can’t be sidestepped by patently untrue assertions – such as that a mile of new surface dual carriageway across a World Heritage landscape is a modification that wouldn’t affect the Outstanding Universal Value! Or, even more preposterously, would enhance it!
The Heritage Journal 
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
15/07/2020 at 21:50
David Hassett
This is a generalised assertion that you have; erroneously ascribed as relating to the Stonehenge WHS. About time you stopped this and concentarted your energies on the broader picture.
16/07/2020 at 05:54
heritageaction
A local pro-road campaigner urges looking at the broader picture! 🙂