You are currently browsing the monthly archive for November 2010.
Two crucial aspects of the Stonehenge proposals have yet to be clarified…
1. The transit system.
Will it be like one of the two examples shown here ? Not one like the Eden Project, please! That one is called “Percy”. Very tasteful! So more like the Dover Castle one? It may be, if this video is a true representation. But the video one pulls four carriages, not two. Is the vehicle up to it? And what about the livery? Can we be solemnly promised it will never ever carry advertising? And what’s wrong with buses? And what about talk in The Times letters column of Lord Lansdowne saying Stonehenge would be turned into a toytown with visitors approaching in dinky electric vehicles? Isn’t anything that prompts thoughts of Noddyland (which it’s hard not to think of when watching the video) to be absolutely avoided at our national icon?
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/daysout/properties/stonehenge/our-plans/our-proposals/
2. The fences
Will the fences be removed? Surely it has been decided upon? After all, if the detailed design of the new Visitor Centre and the colour of the transit system coaches have been decided then surely it is inconceivable that the matter of access to the stones (in other words the fences) hasn’t been been decided as well? English Heritage as good as says it has : “The need to care for Stonehenge properly has been recognised for many years. Improvement to its landscape setting and presentation to visitors are identified as priorities in the WHS Management Plan ……… The proposals to address this need have been agreed by a group of key stakeholders led by English Heritage“
So what HAS been decided about the fences? The reason the question needs to be asked is because the video appears to show that there will be no fences – and although that would be very nice we have concerns that behind the scenes a different view might have been taken. The practicalities suggest that having no fences at all would prove impossible. Security is one problem. And erosion is another. But the video seems to suggests that nearly a million people a year will be free to walk amongst the stones, not held back by fences, ropes or rules. It seems unlikely.
A lot of people hold the “no fences and free access to the stones” concept very dear. If it is not going to happen then it would be better if people were told, not given a contrary impression by a video. Indeed, the public has the right to know does it not? Open access to the stones may or may not be impractical but open access to information about this matter certainly isn’t!
As can be seen the Society has much to offer both to a general readership and the academic community. Its interests are worldwide and “extend from the earliest human origins to the emergence of written records”.
Membership is open to all, and includes professional, amateur, student and retired members.
The Society’s publications include its own Proceedings going back 75 years as well as PAST, its excellent topical newsletter, which is available for download.
Anyone that didn’t see this coming was in denial; from Paul Melia in yesterday’s Irish Independent (the special “Four-Year Plan” section);
“But there will be no major schemes starting in 2012 or 2013. This means the N5 Ballaghadreen bypass, N4 Downes upgrade, N2 Slane Bypass, N22 Macroom to Ballyvourney, N8/N25 Dunkettle Roundabout and Enniscorthy/New Ross bypass are shelved.”
Although they may not remain so; the Department of Transport tells us that these “high priority schemes will proceed as funding becomes available and planning permission is granted”. The Government has effectively pawned the country to pay for the bankers and their credit spree (“Business is about risk“; said Seánie Fitz, but that turned out to be our risk, didn’t it?), but there’re always other ways and means. As the Independent points out;
“The Government is looking at charging motorists to use new and existing routes in an effort to fund new road projects across the State.”
If the bypass, proposed to run just 500m outside the Brú na Bóinne buffer zone, does eventually go ahead and it, as a “new route”, is tolled, then how many of those high-toll HGVs would actually use it? Looking further ahead; how many are going to use any of these roads, when the oil is gone or too expensive to use (a couple of decades, give or take)?
A brief message from the Heritage Action team:
We should like to draw attention to our submission guidance for articles & comments (see link at the top of the page). In view of some comments posted to the Journal recently, it is appropriate to clarify that the Journal is not a democracy. It is part of a conservation website set up to promote and facilitate our own conservation agenda to the very best of our ability, not a facility provided to enable public debate upon whether conservation is important – so postings that advocate any other approaches to heritage or otherwise (in our judgement) conflict with or adversely impact upon our aims are never welcome. Consequently we reserve the right to exercise editorial control over all comments (although we do so as sparingly as possible). In addition, spurious comments from posters using multiple aliases or email addresses in an attempt to obfuscate their true intentions or views are never acceptable.
Please bear the above in mind as we will take it from now on that any comments received signify that the conditions have been understood and accepted by their authors and we will not be entering into any discussions on any editorial actions we may judge necessary.
Many thanks.
You are abandoned, forsaken and rejected. All the powers that be – Meath County Council, the Government, NRA, An Bord Pleanála and the High Court – have walked out on you. We pay them to protect you but they betrayed us. We trusted them too much.
Tara, I know you sympathise with the people who are forced to commute to Dublin five days a week. But why are they not angry with Meath County Council for not putting in a bypass at Dunshaughlin and a proper one in Navan 20 years ago? They allowed them not only to close down but also to rip up the Dublin/Navan/Trim railway line over 30 years ago. And they still trust them. There were so many other options for this road. Are you the same Tara who was magic for Master O’Connell, the principal of Tarmons National School in Tarbert? He instilled a love of you into our hearts, and I can still see the face of Fr O’Flaherty (our history teacher in St Brendan’s, Killarney) come alive at your name. But that was a different generation, other times. You are no longer in fashion. This generation prefers soulless symbols – motorways, shopping malls, four-wheel drives, big trucks and, of course, the euro. I expected all the people in Ireland to have run to protect you. It would have been unacceptable, I thought, to run a motorway through the Tara/Skryne Valley, opening up a wound that no plastic surgery can cure. But this generation was not touched, nor incensed. How sad. Will you forgive us?
The day Environment Minister Dick Roche sanctioned the motorway, I was watching the evening news in a pub. One man said, when he saw Mr Roche on TV, “Isn’t he a pity? I wouldn’t ask him to mind my chickens, and Bertie Ahern put him in charge of our heritage and environment. He has no bottle, afraid of the hawks.” Poor Mr Roche. Maybe he has no power. An Bord Pleanála, which is not comprised of elected representatives, makes all the big decisions. Or does it? Who has real power today?
Democracy, the people’s participation in the ordering of their own lives, is now perceived as a meaningless facade that hides the ruthlessness of corporate self-interest. The suspicion that political ideologies and institutions are becoming irrelevant because politics is being reduced to following ‘the laws of the market’ is creating political unease among people and cynicism among the young about voting. Tara, what else can your support groups and friends do now? Are all avenues closed? Has your hour come? Will we call the lone piper to play a dirge?
Tommy O’Hanlon
Tarbert
Co Kerry
a guest feature by Colin Coulson
Francis Nicholson is a man who made a difference.
He was born, the son of a weaver, in Pickering, North Yorkshire, in 1753. Upon leaving school, he yearned to become an artist. He trained for three years in Scarborough, and for two short periods in London. At first, he was a portrait painter, working in oils. But his several views of Scampston Hall show that, by 1790, he was taking an increasing interest in landscape water colours.
The water colours of that time were – quite justifiably – described as “stained drawings”. The colours were flat and the pictures lacked depth. But during his residence at Ripon, c.1797 – 1800, Nicholson devised a system whereby he stopped out his light areas with a beeswax solution. This allowed him to apply wash after wash to create deep shadows where he wanted them. By gradually removing the beeswax with turpentine, he could apply the washes in different quantities to different areas, and thus grade the lighting. Finally, the lightest areas would be applied in brilliant colour. The Society of Arts, who purchased the method for twenty guineas in 1799, claimed that Nicholson had brought water colour painting from “stained drawings” to having all the power of oil painting.
Nant mill, North Wales (c.1807)
Nant mill, detail
Beginning at the house in brilliant morning sunshine at bottom left, we move to ‘A’, where the trees are mist-covered but not to such an extent that the sunlit highlights are obscured. From there, to ‘B’, where any highlights left are very indistinct. And finally, we go to ‘C’ where even the outline of a mountain is almost invisible. Here, Nicholson grades his mist exactly as nature would have it, and the sense of distance is all the greater for it.
Nicholson moved to London in 1801. Three years later, Robert Hills and William Henry Pyne invited him to join them in founding The Society of Artists in Water-colours. As Pyne would later record:
“From the time his [Nicholson‘s] drawings appeared upon the walls of the first exhibition of the Society, many of its members, Professors of landscape, wrought their elegant designs with a greater degree of force and effect.”
His contemporaries dubbed him ‘The Father of English Water-colour Painting’ because of it.
According to Thornbury (1861) the great J. M. W. Turner was wont to describe Francis Nicholson as “my model”, and once related to a Mr. Munro how he had copied Nicholson’s paintings in his youth. Surely, no artist requires a higher recommendation than that! Nicholson’s favourite pupil, the Hon. Mrs. Henrietta Fortescue was the half-sister of Sir Richard Colt Hoare of Stourhead. This relationship was probably what led to him doing a series of paintings of the Stourhead estate and vicinity between 1813 and 1816. Nicholson dedicated his book, The Practice of Drawing and Painting Landscape from Nature in Water Colours (1820) to Mrs. Fortescue, and mentions the many kindnesses received from other members of the Hoare family. They remained life-long friends.
From about 1816, Nicholson applied himself to the development of English lithography, and was described as “first amongst” those few artists who did so. The first of these were published in 1820. Monochrome was all that could be managed at that time, though Nicholson would hand-colour them for those who could afford it.
St. Mary’s Abbey, York (1821)
Until recently, Francis Nicholson was entirely forgotten in his home town. But, in 2010, a group comprising of Judy Dixon, Gordon Bell and Colin Coulson was formed to address this neglect. A 32-page booklet by Colin Coulson, entitled Francis Nicholson of Pickering, is currently available from The Pickering Civic Society, 102, Outgang Road, Pickering, N. Yorks. at £3.50 (p&p free). A web-site is planned for 2011, and a larger volume, edited by Professor Bell, will examine Nicholson’s work in the wider context of English water-colour painting, 1750-1850. This will be published by Blackthorn Press in 2012. An exhibition of Nicholson’s work is planned for Ryedale Folk Museum in 2012, too.
Today, water-colour painting is considered the jewel in the crown of British art. It is surely a national disgrace that the man who, more than any other, brought it from mere stained drawings has been forgotten, even in his own home town. If this group have their way, Turner’s ’model’, Francis Nicholson, will not be forgotten again.
Glastonbury Tor
Image credit and © C. Brooks
“Two thousand trees are going to be planted on the bottom slopes of Glastonbury Tor, in a hark back to the area’s traditional roots. On Saturday, 20 November, volunteers and staff at the National Trust will begin the three-week project in one of the southern fields. Organisers hope the mass-planting will “be an eye-catching reminder of yesteryear”.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.